|
|
Post by Denver Nuggets on Jan 27, 2010 10:58:41 GMT 2
Denver sends:
(79) Kenyon Martin $15,363,636 $16,545,454(PO)
(71) Linas Kleiza $2,705,723
Incoming Salary: $16,000,000 $17,333,333
Outgoing Salary: $ 18,069,359
OKC sends:
Zach Randolph - $16,000,000 $17,333,333
Incoming Salary: $ 18,069,359
Outgoing Salary: $16,000,000 $17,333,333
i accept......
|
|
|
|
Post by Denver Nuggets Assistant on Jan 27, 2010 10:59:42 GMT 2
I also accept the trade........I have many salary.....so we can do this trade.......
|
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Jan 27, 2010 15:45:29 GMT 2
Yeah sure you have "many salary". I accept this
|
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota Timberwolves on Jan 27, 2010 16:33:46 GMT 2
I can't accept this as it appears both of these teams come from a same IP. Only one team per person, so declined.
|
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Jan 27, 2010 18:51:54 GMT 2
naughty naughty
|
|
|
|
Post by New Orleans Hornets on Jan 27, 2010 20:36:10 GMT 2
should ban that IP...LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by Denver Nuggets on Jan 27, 2010 23:52:00 GMT 2
Sir....I'm not OKC....that's my cousin........Sir....when he registered.....Do we have same IP.....??...Surely not......Sir...I'm not lying.....He passed by here at my house yesterday to see if the trade is accepted and he log in to my computer......Sir i'm saying the truth....
|
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota Timberwolves on Jan 28, 2010 0:27:32 GMT 2
You both had the same IP, I know so. I'm not entirely sure what should I do, I didn't plan to ban you in the first place, but put a warning on you and ban OKC. Right now I have pretty much two options:
1) I will delete OKC and give Denver a warning, but he can stick around, but if this happens again, then ban will be the case then.
2) I let both free pass and give them a warning, but on two conditions, they can't log in with the same IP (this can be easily cheated tho') and I forbid trading between those two.
I would like to know the opinion of the rest of the CM before I make the decision, but right now I'm inclined towards the first option.
|
|
|
|
Post by New York Knicks on Jan 28, 2010 0:36:30 GMT 2
i don' t think trading between the two of them should be allowed.
|
|
|
|
Post by New Orleans Hornets on Jan 28, 2010 6:55:18 GMT 2
while I'm not a CM, this situation happened in another league, where the 2 'supposed' individuals were brothers. Personally I'm not a fan at all of relatives in the same league. It would be different if they had different IP addy's, but that prolly isn't the case here. It has a tendency to looky fishy when they trade back n forth w each other. Not saying this is the case here at all, just to keep the appearance of inpropriety, IMO it's best to only have one at a time in the league.
|
|
|
|
Post by blue on Jan 28, 2010 8:34:33 GMT 2
I would choose number 1, he says he's telling the truth, but you can lie very easily on the Internet.
|
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Jan 28, 2010 12:28:16 GMT 2
I suggest this. We'll reject this one and have OKC post up the exact same trade with another IP address. Anyway, this trade isnt too insane to reject anyway. So i guess for now we let them trade and continue monitoring both their IP addresses in the future
|
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota Timberwolves on Jan 28, 2010 16:21:23 GMT 2
Either way, trading shouldn't be allowed between those two. By the way, both of them logged in from one IP, when they posted here, but the last time they logged in was from another IP (both) . The only possible solution that I could think of is that Denver can only log in from one IP and OKC from another, they would tell me which is which, but still quite pessimistic about it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Jan 28, 2010 19:48:02 GMT 2
Well if that's the case i think we could fire OKC. I know its a little brutal. But all the precautions/banning is not worth having the extra GM. So u may want to consider getting did of OKC for now
|
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Jan 29, 2010 8:22:54 GMT 2
It happened to me before. And it was so bad. Those that were in the short-lived FDL Dynasty would know. Honestly the only way to stop this would be a ban. My opinion on this is quite strong. It would be best to ban the both of them.
|
|
|
|
Post by New Orleans Hornets on Jan 29, 2010 20:40:27 GMT 2
I would choose number 1, he says he's telling the truth, but you can lie very easily on the Internet. I agree ... |
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota Timberwolves on Jan 29, 2010 22:58:34 GMT 2
I think I have come to decision. I will let them stay, but OKC can be only Denver's assistant, nothing more, at least for now. Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
Post by Utah Jazz on Jan 29, 2010 23:02:47 GMT 2
I think that is a good idea.
It is probably the nicest thing that you can do to either of them, not to mention the most fair for the rest of the league.
|
|
|
|
Post by New Orleans Hornets on Jan 30, 2010 0:25:36 GMT 2
I think that is a good idea. It is probably the nicest thing that you can do to either of them, not to mention the most fair for the rest of the league. i like it |
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota Timberwolves on Jan 30, 2010 19:25:13 GMT 2
OKC will now be Denvers Assistant. If you have any questions about the job, ask me away.
|
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte Bobcats on Feb 1, 2010 17:26:49 GMT 2
I have to say that was nicely done Minny. (Y)
|
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Pistons on Feb 2, 2010 11:52:39 GMT 2
So i'd assume this trade is rejected then?
|
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota Timberwolves on Feb 2, 2010 16:24:04 GMT 2
Yes.
|
|
